AI-Powered Oxford-Style Debates

Every argument
deserves a fair fight

Submit any claim, and watch AI agents debate it with real evidence.Get a verdict backed by citations, not opinions.

Try: "Is cryptocurrency the future of money?" or "Should we colonize Mars?"

189
Debates Settled
94%
Citation Accuracy
PROvsCON
Fair & Balanced

From the Arena

Real Debates. Real Verdicts.

All debates →

How It Works

From question to verdict in four simple steps

1

State Your Claim

Enter any topic, question, or stance you want to explore. Choose your AI models and debate depth.

2

Watch AI Debate

Pro and Con agents research live sources and argue across multiple rounds. A Judge scores each round on evidence, logic, and persuasiveness.

3

Get the Verdict

See a definitive verdict with confidence scoring, cumulative score progression, and key arguments from each side.

4

Listen & Share

Turn any debate into an AI podcast with three distinct voices. Transform with Lenses and share with friends.

Live Debate Preview
“Is nuclear energy the best path to net-zero?”
Verdict
Opening
Rebuttal
Closing
Sources
Pro: 7.8PRO wins roundCon: 7.2
Evidence Quality (30%)
8.07.5
Logical Reasoning (30%)
7.57.0
Engagement (20%)
8.07.5
Persuasiveness (20%)
7.56.8
⚖️ Judge Analysis

Pro presented stronger empirical evidence on scalability and lifecycle emissions. Con raised valid concerns on waste disposal but lacked recent data on Gen IV reactor safety advances.

PRO
7.8
Citation: [1] [2]412 words
CON
7.2
Citation: [3] [4]387 words

Built for Truth-Seekers

Every feature designed to surface evidence, not echo chambers

Real-Time Research

AI agents conduct live web searches and cite real sources. No hallucinated facts.

Verified Citations

Every claim is backed by clickable source links you can verify yourself.

Multi-Category Scoring

Judge evaluates evidence quality, logic, rebuttals, and rhetoric separately.

Lens Transformations

View debates as roast battles, ELI5 summaries, academic papers, and more.

Share Everywhere

Publish debates with beautiful previews. Embed on your blog or share on social.

Fair & Balanced

Independent Pro and Con agents ensure both sides get rigorous representation.

Model DiversityNew

Choose from 8+ AI models across multiple providers. Compare how different models analyze the same question.

Backed by Science

Built on Mercier & Sperber's Argumentative Theory and Kahneman's Adversarial Collaboration framework.

AI PodcastsNew

Turn any debate into an AI-generated podcast with three distinct voices. Listen on the go.

Built-in AI Guide

Meet Jax

Your personal AI assistant for REBUTL — always on, always context-aware. Tap the button in the corner to start a conversation.

Jax knows the entire REBUTL platform and adapts to wherever you are — on the homepage, browsing debates, or watching a live argument unfold. Just ask in plain language.

Find & explore debates

Browse the full archive or ask Jax to surface relevant debates on any topic — by stance, verdict, or keyword.

Brainstorm debate topics

Describe what you want to explore. Jax suggests strong angles, position framings, and talking points.

Navigate pricing & tiers

Not sure which tier is right for you? Jax walks through credits, costs, and what each debate actually gets you.

Get instant answers

From how debates work to why yours is still running — Jax knows every corner of the platform.

JAXAssistant
Hi! I'm Jax — your guide to REBUTL. Ask me anything about debates, pricing, or how the platform works.
What's a strong topic about climate tech to debate?

Great angle! Two strong framings:

  • “Offshore wind is the fastest path to net-zero”
  • “Nuclear is essential for deep decarbonization”

Want me to open the debate wizard?

Ask Jax anything...
Research-Backed Methodology

The most bias-free way to reach a conclusion

Every information source carries bias. Every AI model carries bias. The only way through is to pit them against each other — adversarially, with equal resources, multiple rounds, and full access to the internet — so their biases cancel out.

REBUTL's approach is grounded in peer-reviewed research: Mercier & Sperber's Argumentative Theory of Reasoning, Kahneman's Adversarial Collaboration, and the latest multi-agent AI debiasing research from AAAI, NeurIPS, and ICML. We combine frontier models from different providers — each with their own training data and perspectives — in a structured Oxford-style debate.

Read our full methodology
Adversarial Debate Process
Model A
Provider 1
Model B
Provider 2
Model C
Provider 3
1
PROCON
Round 1
2
PROCON
Round 2
3
PROCON
Round 3
⚖️ Bias-Balanced Verdict
Scored across evidence, logic, rebuttals & rhetoric

Free

Try REBUTL at no cost

Free
  • 1 debate per day
  • 1-round format
  • Basic research & citations
  • Lens transformations
  • AI Podcasts
Get Started Free

Standard

Best-in-class open-weight models

$0.70per debate30% OFF
  • Up to 5 rebuttal rounds (2 included)
  • Kimi K2.5, GLM-5, MiniMax M2.5, DeepSeek V3.2
  • Multi-source real-time research & citations
  • Full debate transcript
  • Public or private visibility
Start Standard Debate
Most Popular

Premium

State-of-the-art frontier models

$1.75per debate30% OFF
  • Up to 5 rebuttal rounds (2 included)
  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 & Opus 4.6, Gemini 3.1 Pro, GPT-5.2, Grok 4
  • Multi-source real-time research & citations
  • Frontier-class reasoning & argumentationHighest Quality
  • Priority processing
  • All Standard features
Start Premium Debate

Optional Add-Ons

+$0.21$0.60per extra round(Standard & Premium only)
$0.50per Lens transformation
$0.50$1.00per AI Podcast

Ready to settle
your next argument?

Stop arguing in circles. Let AI research both sides and deliver a verdict you can share.

No account required • Pay per debate • Cancel anytime

JAXAssistant

No conversations yet

Chat with JAX to build your history.

Hi, I'm JAX! I can answer questions about REBUTL, help you find debates, or walk you through how it works. What can I help with?